---

Fresh Starts & Self-Curation

By: Xen Troutman

There’s something remarkably addictive about the idea of a fresh start. At its core, a fresh start is a kind of cleansing from our daily routine; it allows us to move forward, shed old conditioning, and start anew. That is why we all commonly agree that certain moments offer greater catalysts for change over others. Almost instinctively, we tend to anchor our change around new beginnings or temporal landmarks¹ like New Year’s Day, birthdays, Mondays, a new job, a move, or even spending time abroad, as I am doing now. But why do we do this? Most New Year’s resolutions are abandoned by February, so it’s clear that temporal landmarks don’t automatically create better environments for lasting change. So why then, are we so determined to plan our change around a specific, maybe even the “perfect” time?

I think the answer lies in the distinction between presentation and practice. Framing change around a milestone (even a small one)  creates a distinct separation between the old self and the new. To center my theory, I want to use Erving Goffman’s 1959 work, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, which introduces the idea of a “front region,” the part of self that operates when an audience is present, and a “back region,” our unobserved self. The front region (or front-stage ) manifests through appearance, behavior, language, and setting. In a sense, the front-stage self is a performance we attempt to play with conviction so that our actions reflect how we wish to be perceived by our audience. In contrast, the “back region” (back-stage) is a more private, unobserved self. It is the space where we prepare for the performance, process our mistakes, and generally drop the mask to relax. Goffman quotes Sociologist Robert Ezra Park, author of Race and Culture, which encapsulates these ideas perfectly;

Changing yourself, in any form, is not a neutral pursuit. We often crave personal transformation as a rejection of our current state, habits, or our lifestyle. My theory is that, in an attempt to bridge the gap between our aspirational selves and reality, we begin to merge Goffman’s traditional boundary between the front-region and the back-region self. In a state of change, our curated impression intended for public observation begins to bleed into our private, unobserved space, and we start to perform for ourselves. New beginnings like moving abroad, starting a new job, or the start of a new month act as psychological resets, an external motivator that make personal transformation easier. -For our personal psyche, creating a space where we can separate our old and new selves becomes an important part of coping with and priming ourselves for change.

Typically, Goffman’s framework requires an outward observer for the presence of the front-stage self; this means one must face the immediate possibility of being observed and interpreted by another person to operate within their front region. While this directly conflicts with my analysis, I want to share an example used in Goffman’s The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , where we see how it is possible to become our own primary audience while acting on the front stage. This example opens up the possibility that these regions of self are not rigid boundaries, but flexible depending on both the person and environment.

Goffman uses William Sansom’s novel A Contest of Ladies (1956), where the character Preedy, a vacationing Englishman, makes his first appearance on a beach in Spain:

In this example, Preedy’s performance is actively staged. He curates a range of front-stage personas (“Methodical Preedy” to “Big-Cat Preedy”) using props like a Spanish translation of Homer and a carefully organized beach bag. Yet, Preedy avoids eye contact, ignoring the other beachgoers. He explicitly does not interact with or perform for anyone in particular. In fact, the author points out that “The beach might have been empty,” suggesting Preedy’s actions would not have been altered if he were alone. Thus, although Preedy occupied a public, observable place, his thoughts and actions demonstrate that his primary audience was internal. He exhibited behaviors primarily for his own evaluation, against the backdrop of a personal temporal landmark, his vacation.

✺✺✺

When I first arrived in Seoul, Korea just shy of two months ago, I had expectations. Not for what my life would look like –I knew very little of what my day-to-day would entail– but for what I would be like. As any recent graduate, I imagined post-grad life as a sort of enlightened bliss. With a college degree, I would carry myself in a more professional manner. I would possess a smoothness in social interaction not afforded to the unseasoned college student. And most importantly, I would reflect a level of humility and eagerness to not just seek answers, but learn from those around me. I naturally assumed that with the right place and time, my character would follow. And in a sense, it did.

I had enough forethought to plan for my change (methodical Xen); I made a very detailed list of all the things I wanted to accomplish during my time in Seoul. The list was separated by month so I could keep track of my progress, incorporating both personal and professional goals. Whenever a goal was missed, it would simply be absorbed into the next month (an actual bylaw I included for myself). However, I quickly discovered that when you leave home, your bad habits tend to follow you.

To be perfectly honest, I did not do well. I knew a little over half the words on the list. However, when we reviewed our answers after the test, I was somewhat relieved to find that I was on par with my two classmates.

Reflecting on that moment, I immediately felt a wave of resistance toward my own relief. I had to ask myself: why was I so quick to accept my own mediocrity? Was it really that comforting to know I wasn’t the worst in the room?

Caring whether I was “on par” with my classmates was just another form of external performance, a comfort within meeting a collective benchmark. But learning a language is personal and shouldn’t be measured against the audience of others. I wanted to shift my focus entirely and start performing for myself.

The day after the exam, I bought new flashcards and Post-its. I began labeling things within my office and attempted to read the labels as I used each item. I kept reminding myself that learning new material outside of Korean class would not “set me back” because you cannot and should not compare who learns the language the best; you can only measure who knows the material. As I develop my sense of self, I find that I often behave reflexively. Situations receive little thought in the moment, then large analysis on the back end. When conducting research for this post, I chose to reflect on fresh starts because I have had quite a few, and I often use them as motivators for self-development. Regardless of what we use to improve, it is important to continue to challenge ourselves and constantly be thinking of ways to intentionally cultivate personal growth.

To conclude, whether we are conscious of it or not, we continue to develop our sense of self daily. The best any of us can hope for is a little self-awareness coupled with a desire to be better. Personally, I’ve stopped waiting for fresh starts. Today, I am me. Tomorrow I will be a better me.

SOURCES

1. The Editors of The Global Council for Behavioral Science (2026, February 23). Temporal landmarks and behavioral modification: leveraging the “fresh start effect” for organizational change. Global Council for Behavioral Science. https://gc-bs.org/p/45-temporal-landmarks-behavioral-4da7/
2. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books. http://nwkpsych.rutgers.edu/~kharber/selectedtopicsinsocialpsychology/READINGS/Goffman.pdf